تفاصيل الرسالة العلمية

The aim of this study is to learn about the meaning of international humanitarian law and to study the basic rules of international humanitarian law governing the conduct of hostilities during the war and the categories and persons protected by this law in comparison with Islamic law. In this study, the researcher used the deductive, analytical and comparative method by studying the problems of disintegration and composition, interpretation, criticism and deduction, through the introduction and giving, or correspondence and symmetry in jurisprudential and legal issues. The researcher also used the integrated method of the thesis, Reading through the link between what is written and what is on the ground, and by providing useful information away from padding. This study is based on an introduction and four questions. The researcher has come to define IHL as: a set of rules and legal provisions that regulate the conduct of international armed conflicts, whether internal or external, and are separated by positive law from the reference of rules and provision . The basic rules governing hostilities are based on the rules of discrimination, proportionality, precaution, prohibition of causing superfluous harm or unnecessary suffering. The motivation to abide by these rules in Islamic law stems from the belief that is motivated by obligation, unlike law. Because it stems from the force of law enforcement and the power of the warring states